Externalities in wind power generation

Published: 2023/07/04 Number of words: 1552

INTRODUCTION

Corporate organisations are generally run to maximise profit, either by reducing cost, increasing revenue or both. In Business, the cost incurred by an organisation stems from capital expenditures and operational expenditures only. However, in the field of Environmental Economics, these two branches of expenditures only make up the private cost.

Externalities as we know it, exist when a party does not bear all the associated costs or receive all the benefits of their action(s). Costanza et al., (2007) in their research portrayed externalities as the positive or negative consequences of an economic activity on the quality of life of another party. These additional costs are generally referred to as external cost.

Therefore, the more accurate valuation of total cost of production for an organisation is the summation of the private and external costs, and this results in the social cost.

Private cost + External cost = Social cost

Unlike private cost, social cost considers the externalities that come as a result of an organisation’s physical operations and economic decisions.

DISCUSSION

The UK government has publicly expressed its commitment to attain net zero carbon by 2050 (Gov.uk, 2019), this will result to the transition of energy generation from fossil fuel sources to cleaner sources like renewables. With the Prime Minister Boris Johnson taking this challenge further, announcing the UK’s plan to achieve 100% generation of its electricity from clean energy by 2035, the United Kingdom is expected to generate its electricity exclusively from nuclear, solar energy, wind energy other renewable energy sources (Reuters, 2021).

As at second quarter of 2021, the UK’s total installed capacity of wind power was 24.7 GW (onshore wind – 14.2 GW, offshore wind – 10.5 GW) (Gov.uk, 2021a). For the UK to successfully run a 100% clean energy grid by 2035, there is need to increase its installed renewable energy capacity, with plans being made to scale up offshore wind power capacity to 40 GW by 2030, and an additional 3.5 GW increase in onshore wind power capacity (Gov.uk, 2021b).

According to Hall (1990), the private cost is not the accurate representation of the total cost of production, as there are external costs that are unaccounted for, or cannot be measured with the conventional financial valuation methods. In the development, construction and operation of wind farms, the private cost refers to the proposed capital and operational expenditures physically incurred during the installation, operation, maintenance and decommissioning of these facilities. These generally include the following: procurement of materials and manpower, cost of land (for onshore wind turbines), installation of wind turbines and associated maintenance costs. According to Phelan and Jacobs (2016), externalities are typically not reflected in economic transactions. They do, however have a direct impact on the welfare and social benefits of neighbouring parties, and thus on economic value.

The private cost of wind farms can be determined by summing up the cost of materials, machines, manpower used throughout the lifecycle of the wind turbines that make up the wind farm. However, this paper focuses on the external cost incurred in the development of wind farms.

The external cost investigated in this paper can be grouped into two major categories: quality of life (human and wildlife) and technical (wake effect).

  • Quality of Life

Zerrahn (2017) highlighted some sources of external cost associated with the installation of wind turbines. In his research, he identified noise emissions as one of the direct external impacts of wind turbines. However, General Electric (2014) argues that wind turbines are installed at a distance of at least 300 meters from residential areas, and at this distance, the noise level reduces to about 43 decibels. Putting this in context, this noise level is in the same range of an average air conditioner (50 decibels) and refrigerator (40 decibels).

Standing at 80 meters in height, the average wind turbine has a physical presence on the vicinity, and in the case of a wind farm containing about 20 – 50 wind turbines, Hevia-Koch and Ladenburg (2019) stated that the installation can pose a visual impact in the host community; a deterioration of the aesthetic quality of landscapes which in the long run impacts the quality of life of the indigenes residing in that area.

Wind power has been opposed by critics of visual and noise pollution, rallies and protests have been held to this effect, with the most recent protest in south Wales, a campaign against plans to build a wind farm comprising 26 of the tallest turbines (250 meters) in the United Kingdom (Wales Online, 2021)

Zerrahn (2017) also revealed that wind turbines pose significant threats to wildlife. This claim was corroborated by May et al. (2020), stating that bird mortality resulting from wind turbines is predominant due to physical collisions with the turbine blades. Although wind turbines are closely associated with avian mortality, Smallwood (2007) stated that more reliable and accurate methods are needed for estimating turbine – induced avian mortality rates.

  • Technical – Wake Effect

Wind turbines converts the kinetic energy from wind into electricity, the extraction of this energy therefore reduces the speed of the flowing wind, creating a “wake” downstream of the turbine. When a collection of wind turbines extracts kinetic energy from the wind, the aggregated influence from the individual turbines constituting the wind farm is called the wake effect (Wind Energy – The Facts, n.d.). This effect dissipates as the wind flows downstream and regains more kinetic energy as it flows towards free stream conditions (González-Longatt, Wall and Terzija, 2012).

Consider two wind farms A and B in close proximity, if B is downstream of A, it means that the wake effect caused by wind farm A will reduce the amount of energy that wind farm B can generate as explained in the figure below.

 

Figure 1: Wake Effect

As seen in the figure above, wind farm B will suffer from the operations of wind farm A; hampered wind energy generation due to lower wind speed received. This is one form of external cost that the operations of wind farm B might not consider in their financial records. The energy loss can be translated into revenue lost based on the unit price of electricity generated (£/MWh). This loss, although caused by the operator of wind farm A is borne by the operator of wind farm B.

CONCLUSION

Wind power is fast becoming a prevalent technology as the world is racing towards achieving net zero energy status. The financial valuation of wind power projects mostly considers only the private cost with oversights on the external costs. Two major externalities related to this technology revolve around the lower quality of life experienced by the people living around the facility as well as the impact on energy generated by neighbouring wind farms. These externalities show that the conventional methods that evaluate wind power projects financials based on private cost alone are highly inadequate, social cost is a better representation of the total cost of wind power projects.

REFERENCES

Costanza, R., Graumlich, L., Steffen, W., Crumley, C., Dearing, J., Hibbard, K., Leemans, R., Redman, C. and Schimel, D. (2007) Sustainability or Collapse: What Can We Learn from Integrating the History of Humans and the Rest of Nature? AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(7), pp. 522-527.

General Electric (2014) How Loud Is A Wind Turbine? Available at: https://www.ge.com/news/reports/how-loud-is-a-wind-turbineuk (Accessed: 15 October 2021).

González-Longatt, F., Wall, P. and Terzija, V., (2012) Wake effect in wind farm performance: Steady-state and dynamic behavior. Renewable Energy, 39(1), pp. 329-338.

Gov.uk (2019) UK becomes first major economy to pass net zero emissions law. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-becomes-first-major-economy-to-pass-net-zero-emissions-law (Accessed: 14 October 2021).

Gov.uk (2021a) Energy Trends: UK renewables. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/energy-trends-section-6-renewables (Accessed: 15 October 2021).

Gov.uk (2021b) Biggest ever renewable energy support scheme backed by additional £265 million. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/biggest-ever-renewable-energy-support-scheme-backed-by-additional-265-million (Accessed: 14 October 2021).

Hall, D.C., (1990) Preliminary estimates of cumulative private and external costs of energy. Contemporary Economic Policy, 8(3), pp.283-307.

Hevia-Koch, P. and Ladenburg, J., (2019) Where should wind energy be located? A review of preferences and visualisation approaches for wind turbine locations. Energy Research & Social Science, 53, pp.23-33.

May, R., Nygård, T., Falkdalen, U., Åström, J., Hamre, Ø. and Stokke, B.G., (2020) Paint it black: Efficacy of increased wind turbine rotor blade visibility to reduce avian fatalities. Ecology and evolution, 10(16), pp. 8927-8935.

Phelan, A. and Jacobs, S. (2016) Facing the true cost of fracking; social externalities and the role of integrated valuation. Ecosystem Services, 22, pp. 348-358.

Reuters (2021) All Britain’s power to be green by 2035, PM Johnson says. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/all-britains-power-be-green-by-2035-pm-johnson-says-2021-10-04/ (Accessed: 14 October 2021).

Smallwood, K.S., (2007) Estimating wind turbine‐caused bird mortality. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 71(8), pp.2781-2791.

Wales Online (2021) Concern in the community about plans for UK’s tallest wind farm near Welsh village. Available at: https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/concern-community-plans-uks-tallest-21167546 (Accessed: 15 October 2021).

Wind Energy – The Facts (n.d.) Wake Effect. Available at: https://www.wind-energy-the-facts.org/wake-effect.html (Accessed: 15 October 2021).

Zerrahn, A., (2017) Wind power and externalities. Ecological Economics, 141, pp.245-260.

 

Cite this page

Choose cite format:
APA
MLA
Harvard
Vancouver
Chicago
ASA
IEEE
AMA
Copy
Copy
Copy
Copy
Copy
Copy
Copy
Copy
Online Chat Messenger Email
+44 800 520 0055