Essay on the New York Times
Number of words: 1019
According to Rosenfield and Amy Chua’s arguments, the New York times article poses claims of cultural groups that occurred due to the genetic magic of the traditional aspects. The article uses rhetorical analysis to express the writer’s main arguments (Huang, pp 56-70). According to the author’s perspective, the rhetorical analysis combines all the aspects of emotional appeals to emphasis the evidence of the claims involved in the New York Times articles. The author argues that emotional appeal is a combination of three characters that show the evidence concerning the claims made. New York Times article engages elaborative debate between different authors, thus resulting in more argumentative aspects concerning the claims made by authors (Mokhtar, pp 62-75). This article aims to critically analyze New York editorial publications’ aspects and evaluate different author’s arguments and claims.
According to the Collins publications, a New York Times article is based on life’s social and economic traditions. In 2002 March, Chua published his article arguing that most American societies claimed that, The New York Times was not responding to the community’s claims. This publication resulted in several debates, leaving people with numerous questions (Khalid, pp 35-56). Rubenfeld portrays the applications of ethos as a form of rhetorical thinking at the beginning of the article. The aggressive argumentative of Professor Rubenfeld focuses more on the prestigious and Cultural Groups in America.
Additionally, his publications create a perspective view of the rise and fall of the American groups. The author’s arguments’ presentations respond to the claims emanating from the context, thus creating trustworthy readers, the New York Times editorial publications. Furthermore, Chua and Rubenfeld involve their rhetorical argument the debate of the New Times article, which focuses on solving the community’s claims (Nasri, pp 205 -250). In this case, the argumentative essay draws connections with pathos and personal emotional appeal to impact the information presented. To satisfy people’s claims, the author uses attentional grabbing evidence, such as Asin-American students, to present emotions, which eventually creates personal appeal towards the articles.
However, to evoke negative emotional reactions, the author applies his rhetorical logos to create deep arguments concerning the publications from the readers of the publications. To have a compressive and deep understanding of this New York editorial (Pessoa, pp 42-55). The author brilliantly supports his claims through economic and occupational stability, which correlates with insecurity issues. According to the author’s arguments, it is simple for the readers to identify any arousing negative effects, which may lower the personal appeal aspects.
According to my perspectives, the author’s arguments have generally created positive personal appeal since he responses to all the claims arousing from the context. According to David’s arguments, authors need to develop detached perspectives to develop a sense of ethos and logos, especially in the rhetorical analysis (Pessoa, pp 42-55). The rhetorical analysis involves both weakness and strengths, which may be facilitated by poor applications of ethos, logos and pathos. According to the author’s arguments, critical thinkers are expected to apply all rhetorical strategies to evaluate the information before using it. To support his arguments, Brooks uses all the rhetorical strategies to analyze and evaluate the New York editorial publications’ weakness and strengths.
Brook’s ethos is revealed by using his detached aspect, especially in his publications. According to the current survey, ethos in writing creates a personal appeal to the context’s readers (Mokhtar, pp 62-75). Additionally, his arguments encourage the writers and readers to keep away from engaged perspectives to maintain mental hygiene, which requires one’s honesty. Most prevalent in this rhetorical analysis counts logical appeals mostly related to the logos (Khatib, pp 34-45). The most evidence used in this rhetorical analysis can be statistical observations that most authors describe as a logical appeal.
Logically, rhetorical analysis involves both emotional intelligence and the ability to interpret the arguments of other people. A good critical thinker is expected to show all aspects of personal appeal, especially in problem-solving (Habernal, pp 34). Basing the arguments of Brook, rhetorical strategies should analyze any issues regardless of their weight. Generally, The New York Times drawls the readers’ attention due to its rhetorical analysis and aspects of solving issues critically. The New York Times publication explores both critical and rhetorical analysis of different authors (PETTIT pp 57-72). Basing this editorial publication, several authors have expressed their arguments concerning rhetorical analysis.
In conclusion, this editorial article summarizes different arguments raised by several authors concerning rhetorical analysis. Most author’s arguments focus on different strategies to approach situations by the use of rhetorical analysis methods. These arguments have resulted in contradictions to most readers of the New York publications. According to Amy arguments, thinking of people might be different, resulting in a misunderstanding of the published information. New York editorial publications try to elaborate on both strengths and weakness of the rhetorical analysis.
Al-Khatib, Khalid, et al. “Patterns of argumentation strategies across topics.” Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2017.
Hibernal, Ivan, et al. “The argument reasoning comprehension task: Identification and reconstruction of implicit warrants.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.01425 (2017).
Huang, Yu, and Lawrence Jun Zhang. “Does a process-genre approach help improve students’ argumentative writing in English as a foreign language? Findings from an intervention study.” Reading & Writing Quarterly 36.4 (2020): 339-364.
Khalid, et al. “Patterns of argumentation strategies across topics.” Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2017.pp 35-57
Mokhtar, Marzni Mohamed, et al. “Debate as a tool for learning and facilitating based on higher-order thinking skills in the process of argumentative essay writing.” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 19.6 (2020): 62-75.
Nasri, Mehdi, Reza Biria, and Mahzad Karimi. “Projecting gender identity in argumentative written discourse.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 7.3 (2018): 201-205.
Pessoa, Silvia, Thomas D. Mitchell, and Ryan T. Miller. “Emergent arguments: A functional approach to analyzing student challenges with the argument genre.” Journal of Second Language Writing 38 (2017): 42-55.
PETTIT, MICHAEL. “The great cat mutilation: Sex, social movements and the utilitarian calculus in 1970s New York City.” BJHS Themes 2 (2017): 57-78.