Brazil Case Study
Number of words: 739
In Brazil, the case analysis concentrates on a project that exhibits a progressive interaction between personal and policy. The feat was commenced by an outstanding society that was devoted and apt to rendering room for a comprehensive objective. The notion of dealing with water and spirituality was favourably embraced by the neighbourhood, and it broadened the spectrum of the case to incorporate other facets of humanity’s lifestyles and health.
In the green environs of Morro da Policia, the transitions were apparent. In connection to that, the environs in which children and families play and socialize is clean and well-equipped with recreational equipment. Societies are better united and sociable as a result of the initiative because their environment is friendlier, and they care more about their communities; there is a communal commitment to maintaining the environment clean and pleasant. The city garbage agency was established to oversee waste in the square and water sources, and they collect amassed waste regularly (WHO, 2015).
According to WHO, (2015) Social policy must procure expanses for uncertain but powerful community expressions of innovation and leadership. It moreover exhibits that policy frameworks customized to agency ownership and enthusiasm of communities and community administrators are required, as well as the satisfactory usage of technology in monitoring and analyzing community concerns (WHO, 2015). The instance of Morro da Policia’s green area bestows us vital inspirations into how communities and health practitioners may collaborate to attend to Health social determinants. It discloses the implication of individual relationships and friendships, as well as institutional and policy transformation. (WHO, 2015).
Uganda Case Study
The Ugandan food fortification program has demonstrated that a multisectoral approach may stimulate and utilize volunteer participation, begin the building of policy and regulatory frameworks, and prepare the country for required food fortification. The multi-sectoral approach establishes a framework for bringing in additional public and private sector partners and persuading them of the necessity of dealing with health social determinants. WHO, (2015).
The lesson I’ve learned
The investigation illustrates that where a public-private partnership is compelled to handle a public health question, it is attainable. It would be more likely to work in less volatile industries, compelling it manageable to unravel engagement situations. Food fortification is also a better and less expensive alternative to micronutrient deficiency, according to the case survey. The multisectoral strategy to learning with food fortification furnishes an adequate research framework for tackling additional distress.
The proof so far denotes that teaming with the corporate sector to address a public health issue is feasible, exceptionally when a multi-sectoral protocol is imposed to bridge gaps between common interests and values. This strategy should be used to address the socioeconomic determinants of other public health issues in which other sectors are key contributors. This strategy should be used by Uganda and other nations to address the broader social determinants of micronutrient insufficiency, such as poverty, food insecurity, inadequate infrastructure, poor sanitation, a lack of adequate water supply, and low education. Holcík, J. (2009). Food fortification appears to be a better solution to the problem than relying on the medical technique of supplementation; the medical technology seems to be more costly, extraordinary, and problematic to insecurity. (WHO, 2015).
These prototypes, in my sentiment, are significant in imprinting each nation’s recent health determinant needs. These investigations, nevertheless, have some demerits in that no unbiased dispersion of health services across all realms, hindered awareness of accessible services among those who require them, society’s repulsion to transformation, aid not achieving the intended, and so on. When expanding the project within these nations, or in other governments embracing this technique, there should be a favourable blueprint in place to deal with these types of constraints; otherwise, the government will capitalize on resources in the communities, but services will not transcend the impoverished and those in dire need of the aid, and the project’s impact will be felt by the populace, societies, and stakeholders. WHO, (2015).
WHO. (2015). World conference on social determinants of health – Case studies on social determinants of health. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/sdhconference/resources/case_studies/en/
IMSA. (2011, October 19). WCSDH in Rio: COUNTRY case studies on SDH. https://ifmsa.org/wcsdh-in-rio-country-case-studies-on-sdh/
CDC, (2019). Social determinants of health. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/socialdeterminants/faq.html.
Holcík, J. (2009). Killing inequity: Final report of the commission on social determinants of health. Casopis Lekaru Ceskych, 148(1), 4–9.